Levitt v. Axelson, (1931)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 16
Judges: DAVIS, J. —
Attorneys: Worley Worley and Loftin, Stokes Calkins, of Miami, for Appellant;
Huber, Blackwell Gray, and D. A. McDougald, of Sapulpa, Okla., for Appellee.
Filed: Jun. 29, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This is an appeal from a final decree made on rehearing in favor of complainant for a money judgment against the defendant after the court had originally entered a decree finding the equities with defendant and denying all the relief sought. The facts in the case involved a typical boom-time real estate transaction in which several of the parties were interested. The controversy finally narrowed down to a dispute between Axelson, the complainant in the court below, and Levitt, defendant in that
Summary: This is an appeal from a final decree made on rehearing in favor of complainant for a money judgment against the defendant after the court had originally entered a decree finding the equities with defendant and denying all the relief sought. The facts in the case involved a typical boom-time real estate transaction in which several of the parties were interested. The controversy finally narrowed down to a dispute between Axelson, the complainant in the court below, and Levitt, defendant in that c..
More
There is nothing in the opinion which precludes the complainant from asserting his rights at law as provided by par. 3 of Section 4648 C. G. L., 2928 R. G. S., which was evidently enacted to cover cases like this.
Rehearing denied.
BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, TERRELL AND BROWN, J.J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
