Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Parkinson Riegle, for Plaintiffs in Error;
R. H. Rowe, for Defendants in Error.
Filed: Oct. 14, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Plaintiffs in error brought *Page 95 suit on seven promissory notes aggregating $2625.00, executed by the defendants to plaintiffs in part payment for a second-hand steam shovel, title to which to remain in vendors until all notes were paid. No question was raised as to the sufficiency of the declaration. The defendants filed certain pleas to plaintiff's declaration, all of which were disposed of either by motion to strike, demurrer or affirmative charge to the jury, except the first amended ple
Summary: Plaintiffs in error brought *Page 95 suit on seven promissory notes aggregating $2625.00, executed by the defendants to plaintiffs in part payment for a second-hand steam shovel, title to which to remain in vendors until all notes were paid. No question was raised as to the sufficiency of the declaration. The defendants filed certain pleas to plaintiff's declaration, all of which were disposed of either by motion to strike, demurrer or affirmative charge to the jury, except the first amended plea..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the court below be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.
