Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Norris Et Ux. v. Eikenberry, (1931)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 2
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Roland W. Granat, for Appellants; Seymour, Jones Wood, for Appellees.
Filed: Oct. 16, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 106 This is a case in which vendors as complainants, seek to foreclose a contract for the sale of real estate. However, the bill of complaint alleges: "That on account of defendant's failure and refusal to pay the amount due complainants or to otherwise *Page 107 comply with the terms and conditions of said agreement on his part to be performed, your complain
More

The record in this cause having been considered by the court and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the order of the court below should be, and *Page 121 the same is hereby, affirmed and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the bill without prejudice.

BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer