Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Randall v. Mickle, (1931)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 15
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: John S. Byington and W. W. Judge, of Orlando, for Plaintiff in Error; Hull, Landis and Whitehair, of DeLand, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Nov. 18, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: An action was brought by E. L. Mickle, as Liquidator of the East Coast Bank and Trust Company, whom we will call the plaintiff, against G. M. Randall, whom we will call the defendant, as an alleged stockholder of the said Bank and Trust Company to enforce the statutory liability of a stockholder. The defendant filed nine pleas, all of which were either struck by order of the court or were held bad on demurrer. The defendant then filed four amended pleas, two of which were held bad on demurrer an
More

On the question of estoppel, I see no good reason for the court to depart from its original opinion, written by Commissioner Davis, which was unanimously adopted as the opinion of the Court on the former hearing. In this, and in all other respects, I think the original opinion was eminently sound. Nothing has been *Page 1250 advanced on the rehearing which to my mind shakes in the slightest the logic or the justice of the position the court has already taken. I must, therefore, respectfully dissent from any retreat from or modification of the conclusion heretofore reached. *Page 1251

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer