State v. Bd. of Trustees of Salvation Army, (1931)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 12
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: J. Tom Watson, of Tampa, for Petitioner;
W. T. Martin and Thomas C. Dyer, of Tampa, for Respondents.
Filed: Jun. 28, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 221 This case is before this Court on an application for a writ of prohibition absolute to restrain further proceedings in a Chancery cause instituted in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County wherein the petitioner for the writ was the defendant. In that case the Board of Trustees of The Salvation Army, a corporation, filed its bill of complaint against Ge
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 221 This case is before this Court on an application for a writ of prohibition absolute to restrain further proceedings in a Chancery cause instituted in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County wherein the petitioner for the writ was the defendant. In that case the Board of Trustees of The Salvation Army, a corporation, filed its bill of complaint against Geo..
More
I think the original bill of complaint stated no ground to give equity jurisdiction. The cause of action, if any, accrued after the filing of the original bill as is set up in the supplemental bill and therefore the supplemental bill adds nothing to warrant the exercise of equity jurisdiction. Meulset vs. Massman, 37 Fla. 91, 19 So. 625; First Nat. Bank of Leesburg, vs. McKenzie, 131 So. 790; Pepper vs. Beville,129 So. 334.
Source: CourtListener
