State v. City of Jacksonville, (1931)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 15
Judges: TERRELL, J. —
Attorneys: P. H. Odom and George C. Bedell, for Petitioner;
Austin Miller, Gov Hutchinson, Emmet Safay and Harvey Mabry,
for Respondents.
Filed: Mar. 24, 1931
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The peadings in this case are the same and are predicated on facts identical with those prevailing in State of Florida ex rel. S.C. Taylor vs. City of Jacksonville *Page 1248 decided this date. The motion to quash the alternative writ in the instant case is therefore granted on authority of State of Florida ex. rel. S.C. Taylor vs. City of Jacksonville this day decided. BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.
The peadings in this case are the same and are predicated on facts identical with those prevailing in State of Florida ex rel. S.C. Taylor vs. City of Jacksonville
decided this date. The motion to quash the alternative writ in the instant case is therefore granted on authority of State of Florida ex. rel. S.C. Taylor vs. City of Jacksonville this day decided.
BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
