Daubmyre v. Hunter, (1932)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 18
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Stuart MacKenzie and J. W. Watson, Jr., for Plaintiffs in Error;
Price, Price Hancock, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Sep. 30, 1932
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The American Surety Company became surety on a supersedeas for $10,000.00 given to comply with an order of the Court reading as follows: "THIS CLAUSE coming on to be heard upon the application of the complainant for an order of supersedeas from the final decree and judgment entered in this cause on January 30th, 1922, and to fix the conditions of the bond to be given, and the said final decree and judgment being other than a money judgment and the court believing that the said application for a
Summary: The American Surety Company became surety on a supersedeas for $10,000.00 given to comply with an order of the Court reading as follows: "THIS CLAUSE coming on to be heard upon the application of the complainant for an order of supersedeas from the final decree and judgment entered in this cause on January 30th, 1922, and to fix the conditions of the bond to be given, and the said final decree and judgment being other than a money judgment and the court believing that the said application for a s..
More
The question of possession was not involved in the specific performance suit; hence damages for possession were not recoverable on the supersedeas bond given on the appeal in that case.
Source: CourtListener
