Di Lustro v. Penton, (1932)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 6
Judges: BARNS, Circuit Judge. —
Attorneys: Philip D. Beal and Wm. McChesney, for Petitioner;
Jennings Watts and Olin E. Watts, for Respondent.
Filed: May 14, 1932
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The petitioner is held by the respondent upon an information charging him as follows: *Page 199 FIRST COUNT: * * * Did then and there unlawfully engage in the practice of barbering without first having obtained a certificate of registration as a registered barber issued pursuant to the provisions of of Chapter 14650 of the Laws of Florida of 1931 by the Board of Barber Examiners, said board established by said act. SECOND COUNT: * * * Did then and there unlawfully hire and employ a certain perso
Summary: The petitioner is held by the respondent upon an information charging him as follows: *Page 199 FIRST COUNT: * * * Did then and there unlawfully engage in the practice of barbering without first having obtained a certificate of registration as a registered barber issued pursuant to the provisions of of Chapter 14650 of the Laws of Florida of 1931 by the Board of Barber Examiners, said board established by said act. SECOND COUNT: * * * Did then and there unlawfully hire and employ a certain person..
More
I entertain no doubt as to the validity of the exemptions of those classes of persons falling under the designations contained in paragraphs (A), (B) and (C) of Sec. 4 of the Act under consideration. Each of the classes named in these paragraphs is regulated and controlled by other statutes applicable to them and they having complied with such other statutes may, without first complying with the statute regulating the barbers vocation, do those things incident to their respective regulated vocations, although such things may also be incident to the vocation of a barber.
Source: CourtListener
