Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Marshall F. Sanders, Attorney for Plaintiff in Error;
LeSuer Gaulden, Attorney for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Feb. 23, 1932
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 331 The action in this case is based upon a promissory note under seal. The defendant filed four "amended" pleas and an "additional" or fifth plea to the declaration. The plaintiff demurred to, and also moved to strike, all of these pleas and each of them severally. The demurrers were sustained and the motions were granted and thereupon, final judgment was en
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 331 The action in this case is based upon a promissory note under seal. The defendant filed four "amended" pleas and an "additional" or fifth plea to the declaration. The plaintiff demurred to, and also moved to strike, all of these pleas and each of them severally. The demurrers were sustained and the motions were granted and thereupon, final judgment was ent..
More
The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the court below be, and the same is hereby reversed and the cause remanded with directions to proceed further in accordance with law.
BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.
TERRELL, J., not participating.
