Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: W. Gerry Miller and J. W. Coleman, for Appellant;
Julian E. Ross, for Appellees.
Filed: Feb. 05, 1934
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This case is before us on motion to dismiss after briefs have been filed by the respective parties. In considering the motion to dismiss it has been necessary for us to consider the record herein and also the briefs *Page 861 filed by the respective parties. Having done this, we have arrived at the conclusion that no reversible error is disclosed by the record and that, therefore, the order appealed from should be affirmed. It is so ordered. Affirmed. WHITFIELD, P. J., and BROWN and BUFORD, J. J
Summary: This case is before us on motion to dismiss after briefs have been filed by the respective parties. In considering the motion to dismiss it has been necessary for us to consider the record herein and also the briefs *Page 861 filed by the respective parties. Having done this, we have arrived at the conclusion that no reversible error is disclosed by the record and that, therefore, the order appealed from should be affirmed. It is so ordered. Affirmed. WHITFIELD, P. J., and BROWN and BUFORD, J. J...
More
This case is before us on motion to dismiss after briefs have been filed by the respective parties.
In considering the motion to dismiss it has been necessary for us to consider the record herein and also the briefs
filed by the respective parties. Having done this, we have arrived at the conclusion that no reversible error is disclosed by the record and that, therefore, the order appealed from should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
WHITFIELD, P. J., and BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.
DAVIS, C. J., and ELLIS and TERRELL, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
