Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Devoe v. Tucker, (1934)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 6
Judges: BROWN, J. —
Attorneys: R. B. Moseley and Frank T. Cannon, for Petitioner; Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for Respondent.
Filed: Jan. 23, 1934
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Petitioner was informed against in the Criminal Court of Record for Duval County for the crime of *Page 806 assault with the intent to murder. Upon being arraigned he pleaded not guilty. Later he withdrew this plea and entered a plea of guilty to the offense of assault with the intent to commit manslaughter. The court adjudged him to be guilty of said offense and imposed a sentence of one year at hard labor in the Duval County jail, of which sentence the petitioner has now served more than six m
More

In this case I concur in the statements of the law as contained in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Brown, but I do not agree that the petitioner should be discharged.

The record shows that the petitioner was in due course and in proper proceedings adjudged guilty of the crime of assault with intent to commit manslaughter. The sentence imposed under that judgment was not authorized by law and was, therefore, void. The fact that the petitioner has served a part of the sentence imposed does not validate the sentence, though the fact that he has served a part of the sentence should, and undoubtedly would, be taken into consideration by the trial court if called upon to impose a lawful sentence.

For these reasons, I think the petitioner should be remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Duval County to be presented at the bar of the court in which the conviction was had at the next regular, or special, term thereof to receive the sentence of the court under the judgment of conviction heretoforey recorded. *Page 811

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer