Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: D.C. Hull and Hull, Landis Whitehair, for Appellant;
Roger H. West and Sholtz, Green West, for Appellee.
Filed: Jan. 02, 1934
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the order appointing a receiver; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the order appointing a receiver; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same ..
More
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the order appointing a receiver; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL and BROWN, J. J., concur.
ELLIS and BUFORD, J. J., dissent.
