City of Winter Park v. State, (1935)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 16
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: W. E. Winderweedle and Jones White, for Plaintiff in Error;
Hugh Akerman, T. P. Warlow, Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Dickinson Dickinson, for Defendants in Error.
Filed: May 15, 1935
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The writ of error in this case brings for review judgment of ouster in quo warranto proceedings instituted to test the validity of Chapter 11325, Laws of Fla. 1295, and Chapter 11802, Laws of Fla., Extraordinary Session of 1925. The action was brought by the Attorney General and certain co-relators, landowners within the area included in the Charter Acts above referred to which was not included in former legislative Acts fixing the boundaries of the Town of Winter Park. The contention being that
Summary: The writ of error in this case brings for review judgment of ouster in quo warranto proceedings instituted to test the validity of Chapter 11325, Laws of Fla. 1295, and Chapter 11802, Laws of Fla., Extraordinary Session of 1925. The action was brought by the Attorney General and certain co-relators, landowners within the area included in the Charter Acts above referred to which was not included in former legislative Acts fixing the boundaries of the Town of Winter Park. The contention being that ..
More
By waiting for over eight years and acquiescing in the extension Act for that period, I think the co-relators are estopped, and I do not see that the Attorney General, acting for the State, has any right to complain. The interests of the State are not adversely affected, so far as I can see. State v. City of Sarasota, 92 Fla. 563, 109 So. 2d 473.
Source: CourtListener
