Harrison v. Wilson, (1935)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 20
Judges: DAVIS, J. —
Attorneys: Ralph E. Harrison, in pro per, for Petitioner;
W. T. Hendry, for Respondent Sheriff;
Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell,
Assistant, for the State.
Filed: Sep. 12, 1935
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This is an original proceeding in the Supreme Court the primary object of which is to have the validity of Chapter 17684 (House Bill 227) Special Acts of 1935, Laws of Florida, adjudicated with reference to the provisions of Section 21 of Article III of the Constitution of Florida, as amended in 1928, relating to the method of enactment of special or local legislation. Chapter 17684, aforesaid, is in form and substance a special and local law on the subject of hunting deer and game, and is appli
Summary: This is an original proceeding in the Supreme Court the primary object of which is to have the validity of Chapter 17684 (House Bill 227) Special Acts of 1935, Laws of Florida, adjudicated with reference to the provisions of Section 21 of Article III of the Constitution of Florida, as amended in 1928, relating to the method of enactment of special or local legislation. Chapter 17684, aforesaid, is in form and substance a special and local law on the subject of hunting deer and game, and is applic..
More
I do not think the affidavit in this case sufficiently identifies, neither does it correctly identify the bill to which it is supposed to relate. Otherwise, I concur in the conclusion reached by Mr. Justice DAVIS, but to some extent for different reasons. The reasons upon which I base my conclusions are stated in part in my dissenting opinion in Douglas v. Willet, 99 Fla. 755, 128 So. 2d 613, and also in part in the opinion of the Court in Milner v. Hatton, 100 Fla. 210,129 So. 593.
Source: CourtListener
