Krusen Land Timber Co. v. Tampa Suburban, (1935)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 12
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: W. F. Hobbs, for Appellant;
D.C. McMullen and D. Frederick McMullen, for Appellees;
Filed: Jan. 18, 1935
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: On June 16, 1933, a bill in equity was filed against the Krusen Land Timber Company, by Tampa Suburban Corporation, Paskill Corporation, and Percy A. Rockefeller as joint complainants but as suitors on individual *Page 174 and non joint claims, alleging that the defendant timber company was utterly irresponsible and insolvent, that certain timber in which complainants had an interest had been taken to the defendant company's sawmill and there sawed into lumber and the manufactured lumber was so
Summary: On June 16, 1933, a bill in equity was filed against the Krusen Land Timber Company, by Tampa Suburban Corporation, Paskill Corporation, and Percy A. Rockefeller as joint complainants but as suitors on individual *Page 174 and non joint claims, alleging that the defendant timber company was utterly irresponsible and insolvent, that certain timber in which complainants had an interest had been taken to the defendant company's sawmill and there sawed into lumber and the manufactured lumber was so c..
More
The main question hereinabove discussed was not embraced in the "Statement of Questions Involved," nor insisted upon in argument, on appellant's first brief. Therefore we could have treated it as waived, as indeed it was, under Rule 20 of Supreme Court Practice.
ELLIS, J., concurs.
Source: CourtListener
