Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Utility Battery Mfg. Co., (1935)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 4
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: Claibourne M. Phipps, for Plaintiff in Error; Mabry, Reaves, Carlton White, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Dec. 27, 1935
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This is a suit on a bond given by the complainant in a suit for receivership, accounting, etc., to obtain, or make effective, the appointment by the Circuit Court of a receiver of the Utility Battery Manufacturing Company, a corporation, the New Amsterdam Casualty Company being a surety on the bond. C.E. Yocam and wife filed a bill of complaint against the Utility Battery Manufacturing Company, Arnold S. Kirkeby, E.O. Kirkeby and H.D. Wentworth, charging violation of a contract between Yocam and
More

ON REHEARING.
Original opinion adhered to and judgment of reversal heretofore rendered confirmed on rehearing.

WHITFIELD, C.J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur. *Page 736

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer