Goertner v. Gardiner, (1936)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 13
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: Norris McElya, for Appellant;
Mitchell D. Price and Charles W. Zaring, for Appellee.
Filed: Dec. 05, 1936
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: ON PETITION FOR REHEARING. The petition for rehearing herein has been examined. We see no reason for modifying or receding from our opinion heretofore filed except to say that nothing contained therein was intended to adjudicate or to express any view as to whether or not Francis Gardiner was or was not divorced from Rose Goertner. The fact vel non of such a divorce is an open question. Rehearing denied. WHITFIELD, C.J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
The petition for rehearing herein has been examined. We see no reason for modifying or receding from our opinion heretofore filed except to say that nothing contained therein was intended to adjudicate or to express any view as to whether or not Francis Gardiner was or was not divorced from Rose Goertner. The fact
velnon of such a divorce is an open question.
Rehearing denied.
WHITFIELD, C.J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
