Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mahin v. Mahin, (1936)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 6
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: Fielding Duncan and Adkins Arnow, for Appellant; Scruggs Sobol and Fred D. Bryant, for Appellee.
Filed: Jul. 22, 1936
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirme
More

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of Braswell versus Downs, 11 Fla. 62; McCorry v. Payne,94 Fla. 209, 113 Sou. Rep. 212.

WHITFIELD, C.J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, J.J., concur. *Page 224

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer