State v. City of Orlando, (1936)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 15
Judges: DAVIS, J.
Attorneys: Murray W. Overstreet, State Attorney, for Appellant;
R. Paul Horrell and Merton S. Horrell, for Appellee.
Filed: Nov. 21, 1936
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This was a proceeding to validate two issues of refunding bonds of the City of Orlando. One issue is in the amount of $2,701,000.00 designated "Refunding Bonds of 1937 — Class A;" the other is in the amount of $520,000.00 designated "Refunding Bonds of 1937 — Class B." Both issues purport to be authorized under the 1931 Florida General Refunding Act, Chapter 15772, Acts 1931. Each issue will bear interest at a rate not to exceed 4 1/4% per annum to be fixed by competitive bidding. The bonds will
Summary: This was a proceeding to validate two issues of refunding bonds of the City of Orlando. One issue is in the amount of $2,701,000.00 designated "Refunding Bonds of 1937 — Class A;" the other is in the amount of $520,000.00 designated "Refunding Bonds of 1937 — Class B." Both issues purport to be authorized under the 1931 Florida General Refunding Act, Chapter 15772, Acts 1931. Each issue will bear interest at a rate not to exceed 4 1/4% per annum to be fixed by competitive bidding. The bonds will ..
More
While I have not changed the views expressed in the opinion written by me in the case of Folks v. Marion County, 121 Fla. 17,163 So. 298, 102 A.L.R. 659, I feel that it is now my duty to yield my personal views to the precedent established by the decision of the majority in that case, to the end that this much vexed and highly important question may be definitely decided and set at rest. I therefore join Mr. Presiding
Justice ELLIS nad Mr. Justice BUFORD in concurring in the decision of the Court in this case affirming the decree of the Court below validating the issue of refunding bonds.
Source: CourtListener
