Judges: WHITFIELD, P.J.
Attorneys: Erle B. Askew, for Plaintiff in Error;
Cook Harris and H.L. McGlothin, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Apr. 26, 1937
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This case is under the hazardous occupation Act, Section 7058, et seq., C.G.L., which covers "railroading, operating street railways, generating and selling electricity, telegraph and telephone business, express business, blasting and dynamiting, operating automobiles for public use, boating, when boat is propelled by steam, gas or electricity." In the first of the three counts of the declaration herein *Page 108 filed by James Dority, it is in substance alleged that the defendant telephone comp
Summary: This case is under the hazardous occupation Act, Section 7058, et seq., C.G.L., which covers "railroading, operating street railways, generating and selling electricity, telegraph and telephone business, express business, blasting and dynamiting, operating automobiles for public use, boating, when boat is propelled by steam, gas or electricity." In the first of the three counts of the declaration herein *Page 108 filed by James Dority, it is in substance alleged that the defendant telephone compa..
More
I think the recovery of a judgment in this case was justified by the principles laid down in the Kirkland case, supra. While I dissented in that case, I recognize it as a binding precedent in the instant case.
