Watt Sinclair of Fla., Inc. v. Hunter, (1937)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 13
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: Erle B. Askew and Osmond R. Bie, for Plaintiff in Error;
Baskin, Jordan Richards, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Jan. 05, 1937
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Defendant in error, as plaintiff, brought a common law action against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries received while working as a painter on the post office building at Clearwater. The declaration was in three counts, the first *Page 751 count was predicated on the theory that the defendant was a general contractor and had a contract to erect the building indicated, that plaintiff was employed by the defendant as painter on said building, and that b
Summary: Defendant in error, as plaintiff, brought a common law action against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries received while working as a painter on the post office building at Clearwater. The declaration was in three counts, the first *Page 751 count was predicated on the theory that the defendant was a general contractor and had a contract to erect the building indicated, that plaintiff was employed by the defendant as painter on said building, and that by..
More
I think in addition to what is said by Judge BUFORD that the case is ruled by Green v. Sanson, 41 Fla. 94, 25 So. 332 (5th headnote) and should be affirmed.
Source: CourtListener
