Atlantic Greyhound Lines v. Lovett, (1938)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 17
Judges: BUFORD, J.
Attorneys: Milam, McIlvaine Milam, Donald K. Carroll and J. Henry Taylor, for Plaintiff in Error;
Joseph H. Ross, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Oct. 10, 1938
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 507 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 508 The writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of plaintiff in a suit for damages occasioned by personal injuries. The defendant in error has not favored us with a brief, and, therefore, that the case may be
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 507 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 508 The writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of plaintiff in a suit for damages occasioned by personal injuries. The defendant in error has not favored us with a brief, and, therefore, that the case may be ..
More
I concur in the opinion and decision of the court except in one particular. I think the verdict was excessive and that some remittitur should have been required.
Source: CourtListener