State, Ex Rel. v. Hobson, (1938)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 11
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: George Couper Gibbs, Attorney General, Tyrus A. Norwood,
Assistant Attorney General, and W.M. Smiley, Assistant State Attorney, for Relator;
McKay, MacFarlane, Jackson Ramsey, for Respondents.
Filed: Dec. 10, 1938
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: On the second day of December, 1938, a rule nisi in prohibition issued out of this Court addressed to Honorable T. Frank Hobson, Judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida, directing him to show cause why he should not be prohibited from further proceeding to take testimony in a certain cause pending before him by reason of a writ of habeas corpus issued by a Justice of this Court and returnable before the said Circuit Judge. The theory forming the basis of the rule nisi was that the Circuit
Summary: On the second day of December, 1938, a rule nisi in prohibition issued out of this Court addressed to Honorable T. Frank Hobson, Judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida, directing him to show cause why he should not be prohibited from further proceeding to take testimony in a certain cause pending before him by reason of a writ of habeas corpus issued by a Justice of this Court and returnable before the said Circuit Judge. The theory forming the basis of the rule nisi was that the Circuit ..
More
I concur in conclusion reached by Justices WHITFIELD, BROWN and CHAPMAN in this concurring opinion.
THOMAS, J., concurs.
Source: CourtListener
