Dreka v. Whitehair, (1939)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 15
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: Carson Petteway and John H. Stembler, for Appellants;
Hull, Landis Whitehair and Erskine W. Landis, for Appellees.
Filed: Nov. 28, 1939
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court dismissing, on motion of defendants, plaintiffs' sworn bill of complaint and denying plaintiffs' motion asking for appointment of a special master and other relief. After due hearing and consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the sworn bill of complaint is not entirely without equity. It is unnecessary at this time to consider whether or not the court below erred in denying plaintiffs' motion but inasmuch as the order dismissing the b
Summary: This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court dismissing, on motion of defendants, plaintiffs' sworn bill of complaint and denying plaintiffs' motion asking for appointment of a special master and other relief. After due hearing and consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the sworn bill of complaint is not entirely without equity. It is unnecessary at this time to consider whether or not the court below erred in denying plaintiffs' motion but inasmuch as the order dismissing the bi..
More
It appears to me that the allegations of the bill of complaint are so vague, indefinite and uncertain that they show no grounds for relief and that they fail to allege sufficient facts to constitute grounds for equitable relief against any of the defendants and certainly none against the defendant Whitehair. Therefore the order appealed from was without error.
Source: CourtListener
