Judges: TERRELL, C. J.
Attorneys: A. Melrose Lamar and Paty, Warwick Mooney, and Petteway Gwynn, for Appellant;
Williamson, Cain Bougher, L'Engle Shands, for Appellee.
Wm. H. Rogers, as Amicus Curiae.
Filed: Apr. 25, 1939
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 106 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 107 In December, 1933. Appellee Nathan D. Bill became interested in the purchase of lots 484, 486, 488, 490, and 492, Poinciana Park. Second Addition to Palm Beach Florida. He learned through D.F. Goodell and Robert E.
Summary: [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 106 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 107 In December, 1933. Appellee Nathan D. Bill became interested in the purchase of lots 484, 486, 488, 490, and 492, Poinciana Park. Second Addition to Palm Beach Florida. He learned through D.F. Goodell and Robert E. ..
More
If I could interpret the provision of the deed, viz.: "it being the intention of both parties to this conveyance that the grantee herein is simply purchasing the equity of the grantor herein in the above described real and personal property," as being a conveyance of the property and not merely "the equity of the grantor" in the property, I would concur in the opinion of the Chief Justice.
