Clark v. Kreidt, (1940)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 8
Judges: CHAPMAN, J.
Attorneys: Elmore Cohen and H.H. Taylor and C.F.P. Brigham, for Petitioner;
Irving L. Kahlback, Shutts, Bowen, Simmons, Prevatt Julian
and Ragland, Kurz Layton, for Respondent.
Filed: Dec. 20, 1940
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: ORDER This is an appeal by certiorari from an interlocutory decree overruling a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint and from a decree granting a temporary restraining order. The appeal was prosecuted under Rule 34 of the Rules of this Court. The record and briefs have been examined and Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari should be *Page 3 granted and the judgment appealed from quashed, while Mr. Chief Justice TERREL
Summary: ORDER This is an appeal by certiorari from an interlocutory decree overruling a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint and from a decree granting a temporary restraining order. The appeal was prosecuted under Rule 34 of the Rules of this Court. The record and briefs have been examined and Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari should be *Page 3 granted and the judgment appealed from quashed, while Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL..
More
I concur in the judgment to grant the writ and quash the injunction on authority of Vincent v. Foss Crabtree,supra, and Clyde Mallory Lines v. State ex rel., 80 L. Ed. 215.
Source: CourtListener
