Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re: Estate of Mato Belin, (1940)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 1
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: W.H. Mizell, for Appellant; Earnest Lewis and Coleman Cook, for Appellees.
Filed: Feb. 20, 1940
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In this cause Mr. Justice BUFORD, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that the decree in this cause should be reversed while Mr. Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice THOMAS are of the opinion that the said decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court sitting six members in a body and after full consideration, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be aff
More

In this cause Mr. Justice BUFORD, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that the decree in this cause should be reversed while Mr. Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice THOMAS are of the opinion that the said decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court sitting six members in a body and after full consideration, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and decreed under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., WHITFIELD, BROWN, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, J. J., concur. *Page 887

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer