Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Woodcock v. Harton, (1941)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 11
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: Millard B. Conklin, for Appellants; Leon J.C. Harton, for Appellee.
Filed: Jan. 31, 1941
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Appeal brings for review final decree of foreclosure and previous interlocutory orders in a suit to foreclose a State and county tax sale certificate. No new or novel questions are presented. No reversible error appearing in the record, the decree should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment *Page 17 in Pershing Hotel Co., Inc., v. Stark, 123 Fla. 26 , 165 So. 897 ; Burns, et al., v. Campbell, 131 Fla. 630 , 180 So. 46 , and Inter-City Security Co., et al., v. Barbee, 106 Fla. 671
More

Appeal brings for review final decree of foreclosure and previous interlocutory orders in a suit to foreclose a State and county tax sale certificate.

No new or novel questions are presented.

No reversible error appearing in the record, the decree should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment *Page 17 in Pershing Hotel Co., Inc., v. Stark, 123 Fla. 26, 165 So. 897; Burns, et al., v. Campbell, 131 Fla. 630, 180 So. 46, and Inter-City Security Co., et al., v. Barbee, 106 Fla. 671,143 So. 791.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, J. J., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer