Wright v. Herman, (1941)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 6
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Attorneys: Morgan Van Valkenburgh, for Appellant;
Martin F. Whelan, Jr., and Mitchell D. Price and Charles W. Zaring, for Appellees.
Filed: Jan. 31, 1941
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The disposition of this case depends entirely on the determination of questions of fact. The record discloses ample evidence to support the findings of the chancellor and, therefore, such findings will not be reversed. A study of the entire record discloses no reversible error. So the decree is affirmed. So ordered. Affirmed. BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, J. J., concur. *Page 23
The disposition of this case depends entirely on the determination of questions of fact.
The record discloses ample evidence to support the findings of the chancellor and, therefore, such findings will not be reversed.
A study of the entire record discloses no reversible error. So the decree is affirmed.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, J. J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
