North v. Ringling Ringling v. North, (1942)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 5
Judges: PER CURIAM:
Attorneys: Milam, McIlvaine Milam, Claude Pepper and Fred Kent, for appellant.
J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, Lawrence A. Truett, Assistant Attorney General, George Cooper Gibbs and John L. Graham, for the State.
Henry L. Williford, James E. Kirk, John F. Burket, and Frost Jacobs (Cincinnati, Ohio) for appellee.
Filed: Apr. 03, 1942
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause coming on to be heard on petition for rehearing supported by briefs filed by order of this Court February 23, 1942, and the same having been read and considered; It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that our former opinion of August 2, 1940, be and the same is reaffirmed and adhered to. It is so ordered. BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, CHAPMAN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur. BUFORD, J., dissents. ADAMS, J., not participating.
This cause coming on to be heard on petition for rehearing supported by briefs filed by order of this Court February 23, 1942, and the same having been read and considered; It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that our former opinion of August 2, 1940, be and the same is reaffirmed and adhered to.
It is so ordered.
BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, CHAPMAN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
BUFORD, J., dissents.
ADAMS, J., not participating.
Source: CourtListener
