The Sunset Corporation v. Doyle, (1942)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 12
Judges: BUFORD, J:
Attorneys: Ruth Alberta Clark, for appellant.
J.M. Flowers, for Appellees, Guy E. Terry and Mae Terry, his wife, James Ernest Stansberry and Margaret Virginia Stansberry, his wife, and John Carl Drury and Olive Drury, his wife; Blackwell Walker for Appellee First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Miami; W.H. Burwell, for Appellee Ella J. Blackwell, a widow, A.N. Spense, attorney for Appellee Earl M. Rader and Hilda M. Rader, his wife, and Otis Kay Doyle and Harriet Doyle, his wife; Joe Brown Booth, for Appellees Joseph E. McGinley and Lillian B. McGinley, his wife, appellees.
Filed: Jul. 21, 1942
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The appeal is from an order dismissing a bill of review. The bill of complaint alleges that the complainant is the fee simple owner of certain described lands and deraigns plaintiff's title by abstract of conveyances. The bill alleges: "That after this plaintiff, The Sunset Corporation, acquired the fee simple title to the above described property, as aforesaid, the same was, on the 9th day of November, A.D. 1934, sold by the City of Miami to the defendant Otis Kay Doyle by an alleged tax deed f
Summary: The appeal is from an order dismissing a bill of review. The bill of complaint alleges that the complainant is the fee simple owner of certain described lands and deraigns plaintiff's title by abstract of conveyances. The bill alleges: "That after this plaintiff, The Sunset Corporation, acquired the fee simple title to the above described property, as aforesaid, the same was, on the 9th day of November, A.D. 1934, sold by the City of Miami to the defendant Otis Kay Doyle by an alleged tax deed fo..
More
I concur, but under the circumstances I think the lower court should be allowed to entertain and pass upon a motion by appellant for leave to amend the bill, if it be so advised.
Source: CourtListener
