Urga v. State, (1944)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 9
Judges: PER CURIAM:
Attorneys: Whitaker Brothers and Cyrus W. Fields, for appellant.
J. Tom Watson Attorney General, and John C. Wynn, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Filed: Jul. 18, 1944
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The appellant, Diamante Urga, on July 8, 1943, was informed against in the Criminal Court of Record of Hillsborough County, Florida, by the county solicitor for the violation of Section 797.01, Fla. Stats. 1941 (F.S.A.). When arraigned she entered a plea of not guilty to the information. On the issues made thereby testimony was submitted to a jury. After being instructed by the trial court upon the law *Page 88 of the case, the jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the information. A m
Summary: The appellant, Diamante Urga, on July 8, 1943, was informed against in the Criminal Court of Record of Hillsborough County, Florida, by the county solicitor for the violation of Section 797.01, Fla. Stats. 1941 (F.S.A.). When arraigned she entered a plea of not guilty to the information. On the issues made thereby testimony was submitted to a jury. After being instructed by the trial court upon the law *Page 88 of the case, the jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the information. A mo..
More
I do not agree that the record is reasonably free from error. When due regard is given to the charge of the court withdrawing certain evidence from the jury, then I think the evidence is insufficient.
BUFORD, J., concurs.
Source: CourtListener
