The Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. Curry, (1945)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 10
Judges: PER CURIAM.:
Attorneys: McKay, Dixon DeJarnette and Sam E. Matthews, for petitioner.
Hendricks Hendricks, for respondent.
Filed: Oct. 26, 1945
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause is before us on a petition for certiorari to review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, sitting as an appellate court, affirming a judgment in favor of the respondent Curry, which had been recovered by him against the petitioner in the Civil Court of Record of Dade County. The action was brought upon an insurance policy issued by *Page 503 the petitioner, the Metropolitan Casualty Company of New York, to the respondent and which was in full force and effect at the time of
Summary: This cause is before us on a petition for certiorari to review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, sitting as an appellate court, affirming a judgment in favor of the respondent Curry, which had been recovered by him against the petitioner in the Civil Court of Record of Dade County. The action was brought upon an insurance policy issued by *Page 503 the petitioner, the Metropolitan Casualty Company of New York, to the respondent and which was in full force and effect at the time of h..
More
I dissent for the reasons set forth in the opinion written by me and concurred in by a majority of the Court, and which was filed, and became a part of the records of this Court, on October 26, 1945.
BUFORD and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Source: CourtListener
