State v. Gray, (1946)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 9
Judges: SEBRING, J:
Attorneys: G.A. Worley and Jack Kehoe and Thomas Jean Ellis, petitioner.
J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, and Howard S. Bailey,
Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Thomas H. Anderson and Hope Root, as amicus curiae.
Filed: Apr. 02, 1946
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Robert R. Taylor has instituted an original mandamus proceeding in this Court naming as the respondent Honorable R.A. Gray as Secretary of the State of Florida. The respondent has filed a motion to quash the alternative writ, and an answer. The relator has filed a motion for a peremptory writ notwithstanding the return, to be ruled on in the event the motion to quash is denied. The whole issue is now before the court for final determination. The alternative writ avers in substance as follows: A
Summary: Robert R. Taylor has instituted an original mandamus proceeding in this Court naming as the respondent Honorable R.A. Gray as Secretary of the State of Florida. The respondent has filed a motion to quash the alternative writ, and an answer. The relator has filed a motion for a peremptory writ notwithstanding the return, to be ruled on in the event the motion to quash is denied. The whole issue is now before the court for final determination. The alternative writ avers in substance as follows: A p..
More
I think the majority opinion in State ex rel. Vining v. Gray rules this case and accordingly agree to the opinion written by Judge SEBRING.
Source: CourtListener
