Brunner v. Brunner, (1947)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 6
Judges: CHAPMAN, J.:
Attorneys: Thomas H. Anderson, for appellant.
C. W. Peters, for appellee.
Filed: Nov. 25, 1947
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: On appeal here it is strenuously contended by counsel for appellant that the evidence adduced in the court below is legally insufficient to sustain the conclusions of the Chancellor to the effect that the appellant (the defendant wife in the court below) was guilty of extreme cruelty. The record certified here consists of several hundred pages of testimony and numerous exhibits and the same has been carefully considered in light of counsel's contention, along with briefs filed and oral argument
Summary: On appeal here it is strenuously contended by counsel for appellant that the evidence adduced in the court below is legally insufficient to sustain the conclusions of the Chancellor to the effect that the appellant (the defendant wife in the court below) was guilty of extreme cruelty. The record certified here consists of several hundred pages of testimony and numerous exhibits and the same has been carefully considered in light of counsel's contention, along with briefs filed and oral argument h..
More
It has not been made to appear by the record nor by any conclusions stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice CHAPMAN that alimony should be exacted of the husband. I concur in such opinion only to the extent that it affirms the Chancellor.
ADAMS, J., concurs.
Source: CourtListener
