Judges: THOMAS, Justice.
Attorneys: Wm. C. Pierce, of Tampa, and Rodgers Kirkland, of Winter Garden, for appellants.
Garland W. Spencer, of Sanford, for appellee.
Filed: May 06, 1949
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Certiorari proceedings by the Market Fruit Company of Sanford, Inc., against Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, and E.R. Sessions *Page 556 to review an order of the Commissioner of Agriculture made pursuant to proceedings held under F.S.A. §§ 596.13, 596.14. From an adverse judgment, Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, and E.R. Sessions appeal. Reversed in part and affirmed in part. See also 34 So. 2d 543 . This controversy orig
Summary: Certiorari proceedings by the Market Fruit Company of Sanford, Inc., against Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, and E.R. Sessions *Page 556 to review an order of the Commissioner of Agriculture made pursuant to proceedings held under F.S.A. §§ 596.13, 596.14. From an adverse judgment, Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, and E.R. Sessions appeal. Reversed in part and affirmed in part. See also 34 So. 2d 543 . This controversy origi..
More
I dissent because the Commissioner has proceeded against The Market Fruit Company of Sanford, Inc., the appellee, only under Section 596.13, F.S. 1941, F.S.A. The appellee has not been given a hearing upon proceedings brought against it for the purpose of forfeiting, suspending or revoking its license. Proceedings had pursuant to Section 596.13, supra, were not for such purpose.
