Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pomerance v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DIST., SC00-912 (2001)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number: SC00-912 Visitors: 5
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Apr. 12, 2001
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 783 So. 2d 1056 (2001) David M. POMERANCE, et al., Petitioners, v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DISTRICT, etc., Respondent. No. SC00-912. Supreme Court of Florida. April 12, 2001. Karen O. Gaffney, Inverness, FL, for Petitioners. Jack A. Moring of Myers and Moring, P.A., Crystal River, Florida; and Sidney F. Ansbacher of Upchurch, Bailey & Upchurch, P.A., St. Augustine, FL, for Respondent. Frank A. Shepherd, Miami, FL, for Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae. PER CURIAM. We initially accepted rev
More
783 So. 2d 1056 (2001)

David M. POMERANCE, et al., Petitioners,
v.
HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DISTRICT, etc., Respondent.

No. SC00-912.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 2001.

Karen O. Gaffney, Inverness, FL, for Petitioners.

Jack A. Moring of Myers and Moring, P.A., Crystal River, Florida; and Sidney F. Ansbacher of Upchurch, Bailey & Upchurch, P.A., St. Augustine, FL, for Respondent.

Frank A. Shepherd, Miami, FL, for Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision of the district court of appeal in Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water District, 755 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with the decision in Lake County v. Water Oak Management Corp., 695 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 1997). Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer