Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Nov. 02, 2006
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 944 So. 2d 251 (2006) CITY OF MIAMI, Petitioner, v. Sidney S. WELLMAN, et al., Respondents. No. SC04-1408. Supreme Court of Florida. November 2, 2006. Robert S. Glazier, Jorge L. Fernandez, City Attorney, Maria Joy Chiaro and Warren Bittner, Assistant City Attorneys, Miami, FL, for Petitioner. Ronald S. Guralnick, Miami, FL for Respondent. *252 PER CURIAM. We have for review City of Miami v. Wellman, 875 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), in which the Third District Court of Appeal cited Mulligan v.
Summary: 944 So. 2d 251 (2006) CITY OF MIAMI, Petitioner, v. Sidney S. WELLMAN, et al., Respondents. No. SC04-1408. Supreme Court of Florida. November 2, 2006. Robert S. Glazier, Jorge L. Fernandez, City Attorney, Maria Joy Chiaro and Warren Bittner, Assistant City Attorneys, Miami, FL, for Petitioner. Ronald S. Guralnick, Miami, FL for Respondent. *252 PER CURIAM. We have for review City of Miami v. Wellman, 875 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), in which the Third District Court of Appeal cited Mulligan v. ..
More
944 So. 2d 251 (2006)
CITY OF MIAMI, Petitioner,
v.
Sidney S. WELLMAN, et al., Respondents.
No. SC04-1408.
Supreme Court of Florida.
November 2, 2006.
Robert S. Glazier, Jorge L. Fernandez, City Attorney, Maria Joy Chiaro and Warren Bittner, Assistant City Attorneys, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.
Ronald S. Guralnick, Miami, FL for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We have for review City of Miami v. Wellman, 875 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), in which the Third District Court of Appeal cited Mulligan v. City of Hollywood, 871 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), quashed, 934 So. 2d 1238 (Fla.2006). By the time the Third District Court of Appeal's Wellman decision became final, Mulligan was pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, ยง 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1981).
The petition for review is granted. On the authority of our decision in City of Hollywood v. Mulligan, 934 So. 2d 1238 (Fla.2006), the decision under review is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the Third District Court of Appeal for reconsideration upon application of this Court's decision in Mulligan.
It is so ordered.
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
