BOUDREAUX v. STATE, 84 So.3d 256 (2012)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number: inflco20120308192
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2012
Summary: PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Boudreaux v. State, 45 So.3d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), review granted, 58 So.3d 260 (Fla.2011) (table), on the basis that the decision of the district court expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of this Court and the decision of another district court of appeal. After further consideration, we have decided to discharge as improvidently granted. Accordingly, we dismiss this case. It is so ordered. CANADY, C.J., and PARIE
Summary: PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Boudreaux v. State, 45 So.3d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), review granted, 58 So.3d 260 (Fla.2011) (table), on the basis that the decision of the district court expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of this Court and the decision of another district court of appeal. After further consideration, we have decided to discharge as improvidently granted. Accordingly, we dismiss this case. It is so ordered. CANADY, C.J., and PARIEN..
More
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Boudreaux v. State, 45 So.3d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), review granted, 58 So.3d 260 (Fla.2011) (table), on the basis that the decision of the district court expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of this Court and the decision of another district court of appeal. After further consideration, we have decided to discharge as improvidently granted. Accordingly, we dismiss this case.
It is so ordered.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
