BERNE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, 84 So.3d 257 (2012)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number: inflco20120308195
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2012
Summary: PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Berne, 49 So.3d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), review granted, 65 So.3d 515 (Fla.2011) (table), on the basis that the decision of the district court expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of this Court and the decision of another district court of appeal. After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdicti
Summary: PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Berne, 49 So.3d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), review granted, 65 So.3d 515 (Fla.2011) (table), on the basis that the decision of the district court expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of this Court and the decision of another district court of appeal. After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdictio..
More
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Berne, 49 So.3d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), review granted, 65 So.3d 515 (Fla.2011) (table), on the basis that the decision of the district court expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of this Court and the decision of another district court of appeal. After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss this case.
It is so ordered.
LABARGA and PERRY, JJ., concur.
CANADY, C.J., PARIENTE, and POLSTON, JJ., concur in result.
LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.
Source: Leagle
