HENDRICKS v. STATE, 108 So.3d 608 (2013)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number: inflco20130131250
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 31, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2013
Summary: PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision in Hendricks v. State, 34 So.3d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss the review proceeding. It is so ordered. POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur. PARIENTE and LABARGA, JJ., recused.
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in Hendricks v. State, 34 So.3d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss the review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE and LABARGA, JJ., recused.
Source: Leagle
