Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Manning v. State, 64-1073 (1965)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 64-1073 Visitors: 12
Judges: Barkdull, C.J., and Tillman Pearson and Swann
Filed: Jun. 22, 1965
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 176 So. 2d 380 (1965) Robert Ralph MANNING, a/k/a Robert Ralph Manning, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 64-1073. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District. June 22, 1965. *381 Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before BARKDULL, C.J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and SWANN, JJ. PER CURIAM. The appellant, by this appeal, seeks review
More
176 So. 2d 380 (1965)

Robert Ralph MANNING, a/k/a Robert Ralph Manning, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 64-1073.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 22, 1965.

*381 Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, by this appeal, seeks review of an adverse order on his petition filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. He urges, as the basis of his collateral attack on his conviction, that he was induced to plead guilty by promises made to him by his privately employed counsel.

We affirm the action of the trial judge in denying relief. The State is not responsible for promises or inducements made by one's own privately obtained attorney, see and compare: Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So. 2d 775.

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer