Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Shoner v. Concord Florida, Inc., 74-612, 74-622 (1975)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 74-612, 74-622 Visitors: 13
Judges: Pearson and Nathan, Jj., and Charles Carroll (Ret.), Associate Judge
Filed: Feb. 04, 1975
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 307 So. 2d 505 (1975) Harry SHONER et al., Appellants, v. The CONCORD FLORIDA, INC., a Corporation, etc., et al., Appellees. Nos. 74-612, 74-622. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 4, 1975. Spence, Payne & Masington, Miami, Joe N. Unger, Miami Beach, for appellants. Sam Daniels, Michael P. Weisberg, Miami, for appellees. Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge. PER CURIAM. Each of these appeals, consolidated here for all appellate pu
More
307 So. 2d 505 (1975)

Harry SHONER et al., Appellants,
v.
The CONCORD FLORIDA, INC., a Corporation, etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 74-612, 74-622.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 4, 1975.

Spence, Payne & Masington, Miami, Joe N. Unger, Miami Beach, for appellants.

Sam Daniels, Michael P. Weisberg, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Each of these appeals, consolidated here for all appellate purposes, raises the same issue, that is: whether a city may be held liable for an injury to an individual upon an allegation that the city failed properly to enforce a city ordinance. The trial court answered the question in the negative. The appeals are affirmed upon authority of Modlin v. City of Miami Beach, Fla. 1967, 201 So. 2d 70. See also Modlin v. Washington Avenue Food Center, Fla. App. 1965, 178 So. 2d 596.

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer