Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ballen v. PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDO., 75-71 (1975)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 75-71 Visitors: 4
Judges: Pearson, Haverfield and Nathan
Filed: Sep. 16, 1975
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: 319 So. 2d 90 (1975) Ivin BALLEN and Rose Ballen, His Wife, Appellants, v. PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee. No. 75-71. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 16, 1975. Rehearing Denied October 15, 1975. Caidin, Rothenberg, Kogan, Kornblum & Benjamin, Miami, for appellants. Weissenborn, Burr & Hyman and Gary M. Carman, Miami, for appellee. Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ. PER CURIAM. Two points are presented in this appeal by a defendant f
More
319 So. 2d 90 (1975)

Ivin BALLEN and Rose Ballen, His Wife, Appellants,
v.
PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 75-71.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 16, 1975.
Rehearing Denied October 15, 1975.

Caidin, Rothenberg, Kogan, Kornblum & Benjamin, Miami, for appellants.

Weissenborn, Burr & Hyman and Gary M. Carman, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Two points are presented in this appeal by a defendant from a judgment of foreclosure. There is no showing in the briefs or the record that either question was ever presented to the trial court. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed upon the rule stated in Caldwell v. Peoples Bank of Sanford, *91 1917, 73 Fla. 1165, 75 So. 848. See also Lee County Oil Company v. Marshall, Fla.App. 1957, 98 So. 2d 510, and the cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer