Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hicks v. MID-FLORIDA PROD. CREDIT ASS'N, MM-162 (1979)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: MM-162 Visitors: 2
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Aug. 07, 1979
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2017
Summary: 374 So. 2d 566 (1979) Jack C. HICKS, Jr., and Erma L. Hicks, His Wife, Appellants, v. MID-FLORIDA PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION, a Corporation Organized and Existing under the Laws of the United States of America, Appellee. No. MM-162. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 7, 1979. *567 J. Michael Davis of the Law Offices of Lansing J. Roy, Gainesville, for appellants. Bevin G. Ritch of Lowry & Ritch, Gainesville, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The lower tribunal rendered an ord
More
374 So. 2d 566 (1979)

Jack C. HICKS, Jr., and Erma L. Hicks, His Wife, Appellants,
v.
MID-FLORIDA PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION, a Corporation Organized and Existing under the Laws of the United States of America, Appellee.

No. MM-162.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 7, 1979.

*567 J. Michael Davis of the Law Offices of Lansing J. Roy, Gainesville, for appellants.

Bevin G. Ritch of Lowry & Ritch, Gainesville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The lower tribunal rendered an order of foreclosure, holding that foreclosure of a non-purchase money mortgage on Florida homestead property is not a forced sale and therefore does not violate Article X, Section 4(a), Fla. Const. We affirm. Hart v. Sanderson's Administrators, 18 Fla. 103 (1881).

MILLS, C.J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer