Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

State v. Ralston, 81-259, 81-260 (1982)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 81-259, 81-260 Visitors: 14
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Dec. 08, 1982
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 422 So. 2d 1093 (1982) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. William Robert RALSTON, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Roth Ross WOOD and Ray Jackson Stroebel, Appellees. Nos. 81-259, 81-260. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 8, 1982. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stewart J. Bellus, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant. Marc S. Nurik of Nurik, O'Donnell & Lazarus, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Wood and Stroebel. PER CURIAM. REVERSED. See Stat
More
422 So. 2d 1093 (1982)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
William Robert RALSTON, Appellee.
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Roth Ross WOOD and Ray Jackson Stroebel, Appellees.

Nos. 81-259, 81-260.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 8, 1982.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stewart J. Bellus, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Marc S. Nurik of Nurik, O'Donnell & Lazarus, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Wood and Stroebel.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. See State v. Benitez, 395 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1981). We also reject the claim by appellees that Section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1979) violates their right to privacy embodied in Article I, Section 23 of the Florida Constitution. Cf., State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d, at 519-520 (discussion of defendant's right not to be compelled to incriminate himself).

Accordingly, this cause is reversed with directions that the charges against appellees be reinstated.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer