Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Friends of the Everglades v. S. FLA. REG. PL., 83-2316 (1984)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 83-2316 Visitors: 6
Judges: Barkdull, Baskin and Ferguson
Filed: Jul. 03, 1984
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 456 So. 2d 491 (1984) FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES, INC., a Non-Profit Florida Corporation and the Izaak Walton League, a Non-Profit Florida Corporation, Appellants, v. SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL and City National Bank of Miami, Appellees. No. 83-2316. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 3, 1984. Rehearing Denied October 12, 1984. *492 Michael F. Chenoweth, Miami, for appellants. Josias & Goren and Samuel Goren, Fort Lauderdale, Greenberg, Traurig, Askew, Lipoff,
More
456 So. 2d 491 (1984)

FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES, INC., a Non-Profit Florida Corporation and the Izaak Walton League, a Non-Profit Florida Corporation, Appellants,
v.
SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL and City National Bank of Miami, Appellees.

No. 83-2316.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 3, 1984.
Rehearing Denied October 12, 1984.

*492 Michael F. Chenoweth, Miami, for appellants.

Josias & Goren and Samuel Goren, Fort Lauderdale, Greenberg, Traurig, Askew, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, Miami, and Alan S. Gold, South Miami, and Anthony J. O'Donnell, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Because information-gathering activities of staff for the South Florida Regional Planning Council neither involved the entry of a rule or order nor determined substantial interests or otherwise precluded a point of entry into the agency's decision-making process, there was no reviewable "agency action" under Section 120.52(2) and (10), Florida Statutes (1983) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-5.111. Appellant's premature petition for a formal hearing, pursuant to Section 120.57(1), to review staff information-gathering and sufficiency notification activities which allegedly precluded public participation in the development of regional impact review process, was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer