Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sari v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 83-2958 (1984)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 83-2958
Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Nesbitt and Baskin
Filed: May 22, 1984
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2020
Summary: 452 So. 2d 64 (1984) Zoltan SARI and Pauline Sari, His Wife, Appellants, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY Company and Rebecca C. Gerson, Appellees. No. 83-2958. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 22, 1984. Rehearing Denied June 25, 1984. Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, Hollywood, and Robert Pasin, West Palm Beach, for appellants. Ress, Gomez, Rosenberg & Howland, North Miami, and Steven Edelstein, Miami, for appellees. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and
More
452 So. 2d 64 (1984)

Zoltan SARI and Pauline Sari, His Wife, Appellants,
v.
AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY Company and Rebecca C. Gerson, Appellees.

No. 83-2958.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 22, 1984.
Rehearing Denied June 25, 1984.

Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, Hollywood, and Robert Pasin, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Ress, Gomez, Rosenberg & Howland, North Miami, and Steven Edelstein, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

*65 PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the step-down between the tile floor of an apartment hallway and the carpeted, necessarily flexible, pile surface of the adjacent bedroom which came to the same level, and upon which the plaintiff fell, was so obvious that, as a matter of law, neither warning nor correction of the condition was required. Schoen v. Gilbert, 436 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 1983). Accordingly, the summary judgment entered below for the defendant owner is

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer