Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Allegra Enterprises, Inc. v. Fairchild, 84-699 (1984)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 84-699 Visitors: 9
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Sep. 05, 1984
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 455 So. 2d 1073 (1984) ALLEGRA ENTERPRISES, INC., an Illinois Corporation, Appellant, v. Ronald FAIRCHILD, Individually, Meridian Marine Consultants, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Ellis Hodgkins, Individually, and Else K. Guinan, Appellees. No. 84-699. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. September 5, 1984. Rehearing Denied October 9, 1984. *1074 John O'Donnell, Fort Lauderdale, and George E. Becker, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Richard A. Goetz of Hodgson, Russ, Andrews, Wood &
More
455 So. 2d 1073 (1984)

ALLEGRA ENTERPRISES, INC., an Illinois Corporation, Appellant,
v.
Ronald FAIRCHILD, Individually, Meridian Marine Consultants, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Ellis Hodgkins, Individually, and Else K. Guinan, Appellees.

No. 84-699.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 5, 1984.
Rehearing Denied October 9, 1984.

*1074 John O'Donnell, Fort Lauderdale, and George E. Becker, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Richard A. Goetz of Hodgson, Russ, Andrews, Wood & Goodyear, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Involved is the ownership and right of possession to a Hatteras yacht.

This non-final appeal is from an order granting a preliminary injunction after notice and from an order which refused to dissolve that injunction.

We reverse and remand with instructions to dissolve the preliminary injunction because of these defects:

1. There was no showing of irreparable harm or lack of an adequate remedy at law. Ranaghan v. Sullivan, 432 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).
2. The injunction provided mandatory features not requested by movants, such as the return of the yacht. Connolly v. Connolly, 448 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Zuckerman v. Professional Writers of Florida, Inc., 398 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
3. The injunction order did not specify adequate reasons for its entry. Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.610(d).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer