Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

State v. Prieto, 85-848 (1985)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 85-848 Visitors: 9
Judges: Barkdull, Hubbart and Baskin
Filed: Dec. 17, 1985
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: 479 So. 2d 320 (1985) The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Roberto PRIETO and Raul Nieves, Appellees. No. 85-848. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. December 17, 1985. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant. Howard Sohn, Miami, for appellee Raul Nieves. Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ. PER CURIAM. The state appeals the trial court's determination that State v. Glosson, 462 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 1985), required dismissal of the criminal c
More
479 So. 2d 320 (1985)

The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Roberto PRIETO and Raul Nieves, Appellees.

No. 85-848.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 17, 1985.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Howard Sohn, Miami, for appellee Raul Nieves.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals the trial court's determination that State v. Glosson, 462 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 1985), required dismissal of the criminal charges against defendants, Roberto Prieto and Raul Nieves. Dismissal of an information is not required under Glosson where, as here, payment to the confidential informant was contingent on the quantity of drugs seized and not on cooperation and trial testimony in the resulting criminal prosecution. We therefore hold that the trial court improperly dismissed the information. We reverse and remand as to both defendants.

Reversed and remanded.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer